<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Dreamweaver&#8217;s defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/</link>
	<description>Web Designer Notebook is a blog for web designers featuring topics like CSS, HTML and Wordpress, tutorials, reviews and inspiration.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:55:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: logiic</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-24800</link>
		<dc:creator>logiic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 03:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-24800</guid>
		<description>Back in the day, the people in my world were using FrontPage, and so after throwing up, I found myself in an agency with a guy that said the magic words &quot;Here, try Dreamweaver&quot;.  That was 1998 I believe.  I use it today in split mode, and of course keep all my styles properly tucked away in css files, and I don&#039;t leverage much of the code that DW spits out if I decide to utilize an extension.  

I am sure there are other better products for editing CSS/HTML sites, but I just feel at Home with Dreamweaver, and still refer to it as Macromedia Dreamweaver *FU ADOBE* (grins)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the day, the people in my world were using FrontPage, and so after throwing up, I found myself in an agency with a guy that said the magic words &#8220;Here, try Dreamweaver&#8221;.  That was 1998 I believe.  I use it today in split mode, and of course keep all my styles properly tucked away in css files, and I don&#8217;t leverage much of the code that DW spits out if I decide to utilize an extension.  </p>
<p>I am sure there are other better products for editing CSS/HTML sites, but I just feel at Home with Dreamweaver, and still refer to it as Macromedia Dreamweaver *FU ADOBE* (grins)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisR</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-9402</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-9402</guid>
		<description>Chris: These days, DW has extensive support/live preview of php and even, from what I&#039;ve read, Wordpress php and templating system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: These days, DW has extensive support/live preview of php and even, from what I&#8217;ve read, WordPress php and templating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris White</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-9365</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-9365</guid>
		<description>Hey,

I too was a Dreamweaver user and i swore by it above any editor. But eventually i grew tired of the lack of PHP support and PHP hints so i eventually tried a handful of editors.

These included Netbeas, Zend Studio, Komodo and others.

All of them are either too slow or lack the management tools i required. No editors have any kind of file management on the level of Dreamweaver, and i could not find one that had FTP built into it effectively.

However, i did stick with Komodo Edit. The only thing i really miss is Move/Cut/Copy/Paste which all seem to work but actually do not. I could get the Komodo IDE but thats not free :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>I too was a Dreamweaver user and i swore by it above any editor. But eventually i grew tired of the lack of PHP support and PHP hints so i eventually tried a handful of editors.</p>
<p>These included Netbeas, Zend Studio, Komodo and others.</p>
<p>All of them are either too slow or lack the management tools i required. No editors have any kind of file management on the level of Dreamweaver, and i could not find one that had FTP built into it effectively.</p>
<p>However, i did stick with Komodo Edit. The only thing i really miss is Move/Cut/Copy/Paste which all seem to work but actually do not. I could get the Komodo IDE but thats not free :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Designer Notebook &#187; Are CSS Frameworks Evil?</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-9347</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Designer Notebook &#187; Are CSS Frameworks Evil?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-9347</guid>
		<description>[...] me). I just thought this would be a good topic to discuss, and I guess I don’t mind saying that I like stuff people usually get repulsed by, so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me). I just thought this would be a good topic to discuss, and I guess I don’t mind saying that I like stuff people usually get repulsed by, so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Strickland</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-8125</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Strickland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-8125</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always amazed at the passion these discussions drum up. I guess it&#039;s akin to rooting for your favorite football team. My team is better! No! My team is the best! But when you step back and put them all in the same white shirts and black shorts. There are the same number of players kicking around a ball. It&#039;s what they do with the ball that matters. If you doubt me read the flaming comments surrounding any HTML5 vs Flash story. 

I guess what I&#039;m trying to say is that Dreamweaver, Coda, Textmate and all the rest are just tools. It&#039;s the man or woman behind the keyboard that makes the difference and always has. Someone using GIMP can produce a superior design than someone using Photoshop. Provided that person is more talented and more familiar with the application they are using.

So In closing, use the applications that work best for you. I started out with Dreamweaver 1.0 and used it until I wasn&#039;t getting the results I wanted, in the time I wanted them. Moved on to Textmate, Transmit and CSSEdit. Used that for a while, got tired of the problems with these three and then moved on to Coda. I&#039;ve been using Coda since it came out and will continue to use it as long as it works for me. When it doesn&#039;t I will figure out what does and move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always amazed at the passion these discussions drum up. I guess it&#8217;s akin to rooting for your favorite football team. My team is better! No! My team is the best! But when you step back and put them all in the same white shirts and black shorts. There are the same number of players kicking around a ball. It&#8217;s what they do with the ball that matters. If you doubt me read the flaming comments surrounding any HTML5 vs Flash story. </p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is that Dreamweaver, Coda, Textmate and all the rest are just tools. It&#8217;s the man or woman behind the keyboard that makes the difference and always has. Someone using GIMP can produce a superior design than someone using Photoshop. Provided that person is more talented and more familiar with the application they are using.</p>
<p>So In closing, use the applications that work best for you. I started out with Dreamweaver 1.0 and used it until I wasn&#8217;t getting the results I wanted, in the time I wanted them. Moved on to Textmate, Transmit and CSSEdit. Used that for a while, got tired of the problems with these three and then moved on to Coda. I&#8217;ve been using Coda since it came out and will continue to use it as long as it works for me. When it doesn&#8217;t I will figure out what does and move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Raymond</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-7996</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-7996</guid>
		<description>Right on! So glad to read sound defense of a great tool that also integrates with Fireworks and can create clickable mockups/wireframes really easily. Due to what all my current coworkers use, I&#039;ve become a Textmate/CSS Edit/Transmit person, but DW is a great tool--and has saved my bacon more than once by helping me to see where I failed to close a div, thanks to code highlighting via clicks in the tool bar at the bottom of the document. Textmate is useless for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on! So glad to read sound defense of a great tool that also integrates with Fireworks and can create clickable mockups/wireframes really easily. Due to what all my current coworkers use, I&#8217;ve become a Textmate/CSS Edit/Transmit person, but DW is a great tool&#8211;and has saved my bacon more than once by helping me to see where I failed to close a div, thanks to code highlighting via clicks in the tool bar at the bottom of the document. Textmate is useless for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PGabor</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-7904</link>
		<dc:creator>PGabor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-7904</guid>
		<description>I love Dreamweaver. The reasons I use it on a daily basis:

- Snippets. I have a bunch of own and when it comes down to repeating code (CSS global reset, conditional comments, meta section, comment forms, etc.), using of snippets could really speed up the process
- Built in validation tool
- Sitewide links checking tool
- Collapse / expand chunks of code
- Find and Replace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Dreamweaver. The reasons I use it on a daily basis:</p>
<p>- Snippets. I have a bunch of own and when it comes down to repeating code (CSS global reset, conditional comments, meta section, comment forms, etc.), using of snippets could really speed up the process<br />
- Built in validation tool<br />
- Sitewide links checking tool<br />
- Collapse / expand chunks of code<br />
- Find and Replace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKBrn</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-7489</link>
		<dc:creator>SKBrn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 06:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-7489</guid>
		<description>I used to like DW waaaay back in version 3.0; however, now I avoid it as much as possible. Why? Because as others have said, I&#039;m a designer, not a coder...and Adobe has made DW way too code-centric. 
Also, DWCS4 has sad site management tools, especially compared with the other visual web site design tool, GoLive. I love that I can diagram a complete site, send it off as a PDF to others for comments, and then create all the pages (with links) with just a click of a button. 

It just seems odd to me that we are still hand coding so much; it&#039;s like we are going back in time instead of progressing. Sort of like going back to the early days of wordprocessing when one had to insert tags or code to make a word italic, or to start a new paragraph, etc.

I hope what I&#039;ve written makes sense, I&#039;ve been up for 48 hours trying to decide on a design &#039;look&#039; for my own site. Pathetic that I can&#039;t make up my mind.

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to like DW waaaay back in version 3.0; however, now I avoid it as much as possible. Why? Because as others have said, I&#8217;m a designer, not a coder&#8230;and Adobe has made DW way too code-centric.<br />
Also, DWCS4 has sad site management tools, especially compared with the other visual web site design tool, GoLive. I love that I can diagram a complete site, send it off as a PDF to others for comments, and then create all the pages (with links) with just a click of a button. </p>
<p>It just seems odd to me that we are still hand coding so much; it&#8217;s like we are going back in time instead of progressing. Sort of like going back to the early days of wordprocessing when one had to insert tags or code to make a word italic, or to start a new paragraph, etc.</p>
<p>I hope what I&#8217;ve written makes sense, I&#8217;ve been up for 48 hours trying to decide on a design &#8216;look&#8217; for my own site. Pathetic that I can&#8217;t make up my mind.</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-7483</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 22:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-7483</guid>
		<description>I learned (still learning actually) coding through Dreamweaver.  Being able to see what it looks like on Firefox, helps me to look at it as code in Dreamweaver.  While at the same time allows me to work/tweak the code right there and then.

To each there own I guess, but it works for me, and I&#039;ve been able to design some decent web pages with Dreamweaver.

By the way I&#039;m a graphic designer, not a web designer.  But I do like to learn other aspects of the design field.  Plus, it&#039;s nice to get as a freelance gig.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned (still learning actually) coding through Dreamweaver.  Being able to see what it looks like on Firefox, helps me to look at it as code in Dreamweaver.  While at the same time allows me to work/tweak the code right there and then.</p>
<p>To each there own I guess, but it works for me, and I&#8217;ve been able to design some decent web pages with Dreamweaver.</p>
<p>By the way I&#8217;m a graphic designer, not a web designer.  But I do like to learn other aspects of the design field.  Plus, it&#8217;s nice to get as a freelance gig.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hussain</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-7447</link>
		<dc:creator>Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 11:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-7447</guid>
		<description>Dreamweaver is a nice tool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamweaver is a nice tool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

