<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Dreamweaver&#8217;s defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/</link>
	<description>Web Designer Notebook is a blog for web designers featuring topics like CSS, HTML and Wordpress, tutorials, reviews and inspiration.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:13:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Elijah</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-6404</link>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-6404</guid>
		<description>I am using DW cs4, it&#039;s fine. i accept your post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using DW cs4, it&#8217;s fine. i accept your post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taufik</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-6104</link>
		<dc:creator>Taufik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-6104</guid>
		<description>Dreamweaver helps me to build tables !!

It is easier to build tables on Dreamweaver than using notepad or whatever-it-is..

Otherwise, DW GUI sucks (I say it honestly)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamweaver helps me to build tables !!</p>
<p>It is easier to build tables on Dreamweaver than using notepad or whatever-it-is..</p>
<p>Otherwise, DW GUI sucks (I say it honestly)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpr</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-5940</link>
		<dc:creator>rpr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-5940</guid>
		<description>The fact that you wrote this article Inayaili, proves a point?

The main reason people make disparaging remarks about Dreamweaver stems from their ignorance. They can&#039;t be bothered to learn how to use it properly.

Dreamweaver is easily abused, but so can any application.

It&#039;s the best tool I&#039;ve used for CSS management:

Right-click a CSS rule on the &#039;Rule&#039; list, to go straight to rule code.

Drag &#039;n&#039; Drop, rule order.

Automatically warns on CSS Browser compatibility issues (90% IE6, which we&#039;ll be able to ignore very soon).

Drop-down list of CSS Classes, that can easily be attached to HTML elements.

Ignore those who are ignorant I say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that you wrote this article Inayaili, proves a point?</p>
<p>The main reason people make disparaging remarks about Dreamweaver stems from their ignorance. They can&#8217;t be bothered to learn how to use it properly.</p>
<p>Dreamweaver is easily abused, but so can any application.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the best tool I&#8217;ve used for CSS management:</p>
<p>Right-click a CSS rule on the &#8216;Rule&#8217; list, to go straight to rule code.</p>
<p>Drag &#8216;n&#8217; Drop, rule order.</p>
<p>Automatically warns on CSS Browser compatibility issues (90% IE6, which we&#8217;ll be able to ignore very soon).</p>
<p>Drop-down list of CSS Classes, that can easily be attached to HTML elements.</p>
<p>Ignore those who are ignorant I say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qoska</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-4237</link>
		<dc:creator>Qoska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-4237</guid>
		<description>@lawless,
 
I agree with all that you said. We should all use what we&#039;re comfortable with and not what the &quot;gurus&quot; advocate. My point is, that for someone who&#039;s starting in the coding realm, DW isn&#039;t the best option in terms of what I&#039;ve said above and even for &quot;how-to-code-properly&quot; because all the distractions ( functions ) the tool has.

On a side note, I to use fireworks for my web design. It&#039;s a matter of using the right tool for the right job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lawless,</p>
<p>I agree with all that you said. We should all use what we&#8217;re comfortable with and not what the &#8220;gurus&#8221; advocate. My point is, that for someone who&#8217;s starting in the coding realm, DW isn&#8217;t the best option in terms of what I&#8217;ve said above and even for &#8220;how-to-code-properly&#8221; because all the distractions ( functions ) the tool has.</p>
<p>On a side note, I to use fireworks for my web design. It&#8217;s a matter of using the right tool for the right job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawless</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-4234</link>
		<dc:creator>lawless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-4234</guid>
		<description>In response to Qoska:

Because it&#039;s a tool I&#039;m very proficient at and am comfortable using. The price is very low when looked at from a time-savings perspective. The difference between DW and something like Coda is only $300US. That&#039;s less than a day&#039;s worth of hourly wage coding. So I&#039;ll see a return on my investment quickly.

As I mentioned in a previous comment, you can use multiple other tools (even many free ones) but there is a time savings to:
1. knowing the software and being comfortable with it 
2. having all your tools in one package.

With that said, I&#039;ll also admit I use Fireworks for my web graphics versus Photoshop. My time is worth money, the tools that allow me to work the quickest allow me to make more money doing what I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Qoska:</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s a tool I&#8217;m very proficient at and am comfortable using. The price is very low when looked at from a time-savings perspective. The difference between DW and something like Coda is only $300US. That&#8217;s less than a day&#8217;s worth of hourly wage coding. So I&#8217;ll see a return on my investment quickly.</p>
<p>As I mentioned in a previous comment, you can use multiple other tools (even many free ones) but there is a time savings to:<br />
1. knowing the software and being comfortable with it<br />
2. having all your tools in one package.</p>
<p>With that said, I&#8217;ll also admit I use Fireworks for my web graphics versus Photoshop. My time is worth money, the tools that allow me to work the quickest allow me to make more money doing what I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qoska</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-4231</link>
		<dc:creator>Qoska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-4231</guid>
		<description>Functions vs. price it&#039;s not equal to price vs. functions you will use it.
So why pay around €500 for a tool that you will only be using 20% of it&#039;s &quot;potential&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Functions vs. price it&#8217;s not equal to price vs. functions you will use it.<br />
So why pay around €500 for a tool that you will only be using 20% of it&#8217;s &#8220;potential&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inayaili</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-4230</link>
		<dc:creator>inayaili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-4230</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting.

I&#039;m glad to see that a lot of people use and like DW, I wish they&#039;d be more upfront about it when talking among peers. I even received some comments to this article via email because some people didn&#039;t want to make it public they like/use it :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to see that a lot of people use and like DW, I wish they&#8217;d be more upfront about it when talking among peers. I even received some comments to this article via email because some people didn&#8217;t want to make it public they like/use it :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawless</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator>lawless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-4227</guid>
		<description>Holy shit, that was a long ass comment. Sorry about the rambling...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit, that was a long ass comment. Sorry about the rambling&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawless</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-4226</link>
		<dc:creator>lawless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-4226</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion. I&#039;ve always used Dreamweaver for my HTML since I started coding. I went to work for a large corporation that had a big design team and a bunch of developers. I was used to using DW as my primary tool for coding and uploading via the built-in FTP. The new job had source control/development &amp; staging servers/replication to production... the whole 9 yards. We used an old-ass copy of Homesite. Needless to say the process flow to update a single bit of text in an HTML file was a nightmare. You had to check the file out in source control, open it in Homesite, find the text you were trying to edit in sometimes massive documentation files, save it then manually copy it from Dev to Stage over mapped drives (did I mention this was all on Windoze :( ) then the Replication would run on a schedule to push the files from Staging to Production.

The first week there I was crying I didn&#039;t have Dreamweaver. You can check files in/out, easily scan multi-column page layouts in split-view then save and FTP into the staging environment all in DW. DW has file synchronization as well in the FTP so it&#039;s warned me many times when I&#039;ve updated personal projects at work and forgotten to pull down the changes at home and nearly overwritten them.

My first full-time design job was using Frontpage when I first started. Luckily I convinced them in the first week to switch to Dreamweaver. I agree that Frontpage/Dreamweaver association forever tarnished DW reputation. FP was a true abomination. 

One thing I do like and find extremely useful is in Find/Replace you can click on the results and it will open the file and take you directly to the search result. I&#039;m constantly doing sitewide Find/Replaces on sites with thousands of files and it saves me massive amounts of time.

BTW, spellchecking is under Text-Check Spelling, been there as long as I can remember. You can do the whole document or highlighted sections.

There&#039;s a lot I DON&#039;T use in Dreamweaver, but the things I do use, I use on a daily basis and having it all in one program simplifies things greatly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion. I&#8217;ve always used Dreamweaver for my HTML since I started coding. I went to work for a large corporation that had a big design team and a bunch of developers. I was used to using DW as my primary tool for coding and uploading via the built-in FTP. The new job had source control/development &amp; staging servers/replication to production&#8230; the whole 9 yards. We used an old-ass copy of Homesite. Needless to say the process flow to update a single bit of text in an HTML file was a nightmare. You had to check the file out in source control, open it in Homesite, find the text you were trying to edit in sometimes massive documentation files, save it then manually copy it from Dev to Stage over mapped drives (did I mention this was all on Windoze :( ) then the Replication would run on a schedule to push the files from Staging to Production.</p>
<p>The first week there I was crying I didn&#8217;t have Dreamweaver. You can check files in/out, easily scan multi-column page layouts in split-view then save and FTP into the staging environment all in DW. DW has file synchronization as well in the FTP so it&#8217;s warned me many times when I&#8217;ve updated personal projects at work and forgotten to pull down the changes at home and nearly overwritten them.</p>
<p>My first full-time design job was using Frontpage when I first started. Luckily I convinced them in the first week to switch to Dreamweaver. I agree that Frontpage/Dreamweaver association forever tarnished DW reputation. FP was a true abomination. </p>
<p>One thing I do like and find extremely useful is in Find/Replace you can click on the results and it will open the file and take you directly to the search result. I&#8217;m constantly doing sitewide Find/Replaces on sites with thousands of files and it saves me massive amounts of time.</p>
<p>BTW, spellchecking is under Text-Check Spelling, been there as long as I can remember. You can do the whole document or highlighted sections.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot I DON&#8217;T use in Dreamweaver, but the things I do use, I use on a daily basis and having it all in one program simplifies things greatly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils Holmström</title>
		<link>http://webdesignernotebook.com/tools/in-dreamweavers-defense/#comment-4106</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils Holmström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdesignernotebook.com/?p=736#comment-4106</guid>
		<description>But looks are darn important, why else would we care about stuff like border-radius ;) But in all seriousness, the look and fell is important, i for one work better in a clean and orgaized environment, and that goes for the office aswell as the tools. 

An AS3-developer at my company tried to convince us to use Eclipse, but for all it virtues, it still looks and feels like and java-application from 98 so that was a big nono...

And, as I said, in the end it&#039;s the output that counts, and i guess that&#039;s why ppl tend to frown upon wysiwyg-editors, since the code generated by the programs usually is (or at least was) utter sheit... 

That being said, I think everyone should use the tool they are comfortable with, and looking down on collegues tool of choice is downright arrogant.


Thank you for an excellent blog by the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But looks are darn important, why else would we care about stuff like border-radius ;) But in all seriousness, the look and fell is important, i for one work better in a clean and orgaized environment, and that goes for the office aswell as the tools. </p>
<p>An AS3-developer at my company tried to convince us to use Eclipse, but for all it virtues, it still looks and feels like and java-application from 98 so that was a big nono&#8230;</p>
<p>And, as I said, in the end it&#8217;s the output that counts, and i guess that&#8217;s why ppl tend to frown upon wysiwyg-editors, since the code generated by the programs usually is (or at least was) utter sheit&#8230; </p>
<p>That being said, I think everyone should use the tool they are comfortable with, and looking down on collegues tool of choice is downright arrogant.</p>
<p>Thank you for an excellent blog by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
